rationalizing religion (a response to chadai)

Over at Chadai Scott has some very interesting thoughts about Jim Ryan’s and my attempts at understanding of religion. I fully agree with his comments about Jim’s idea of naturalizing religion and will let Jim reply if he feel so inclined. As to Scott’s comments about my desire to rationalize religion:

Scott doesn’t like my idea because he does not believe there is much in religion to rationalize; instead, he’d prefer we worked up from the ground of science and ethics, formulating something like an alternative to religion. In addition to the basic objection that religion is not rational enough to be rationalized, another concern is rightly raised, namely that the very attempt to rationalize religion might itself turn into a religious endeavor. Both of these ideas are summed up in the thought that religion is our most fundamental source of meaning.

i will respond to these comments by clarifying what i meant and perhaps even coming up with formulations that Scott could find agreeable.

1. the result of a rationalizing of religion would not be ‘a rational religion’, and would probably no longer be ‘religion’ at all. The goal of rationalizing religion is not to come up with a better religion. The rationalizing process is only a means to an unknown end: the hope is that as we gradually understand why we are religious, our religion will be transformed into something that is no longer religion. We must come to a point where we realize that the idea of religion was mostly wrong; to do so, however, we must figure out what we believe and why we believe it.

put in religious terms: religion needs to be saved. and this salvation can, at the moment, only lie in hard, honest science because that is the only thing we humans are rather confident about at the moment.

2. the best way to understand religion is to translate the relevant portions of our old-fashioned theologies and practices into the more familiar language of science. As the anthropologists of yore, we must stop asking religious people why they do what they do and begin explaining their actions from a different, more objective, point of view. Again, the goal should not be to re-construct an ersatz ‘scientific religion’ but rather to see what happens when we finally realize what religion really is and does. We must attain to the next level of religious consciousness – only then to perhaps realize that we are no longer religious.

3. scott’s and my projects could probably meet half way, he having started from the sciences and ethics and myself having begun with religion and morality – where we meet is a completely new place, somewhere beyond religion and ethics. It is this new place we must reach by working through existing religions with a few philosophical and scientific tools. My method is analytic, whereas Scott’s is more synthetic.

3. rationalizing religion needn’t assume there is a core or an essence to religion – nor any deep structure waiting to be revealed. Rationalizing religion only means clarifying it. The term ‘religion’ does not necessarily designate one clearly definable thing. For one, there are probably more differences than similarities between est-asian religions on the one hand and the three monotheisms on the other. ‘Religion’ is much more the name of a problem or of that which is left once science, culture and everything else is accounted for. Hence the futility of designing a new and improved religion. There is perhaps no such thing as religion; however, that does not imply that we shouldn’t try to better understand (and move beyond) those mysterious aspects of society and of our brains that ordinarily go by the name ‘religion’.


Say something interesting

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: